Balance and refinement : beyond coherence methods of moral inquiry /
We all have moral beliefs. But what if one beleif conflicts with another? DePaul argues that we have to make our beliefs cohere, but that the current coherence methods are seriously flawed. It is not just the arguments that need to be considered in moral enquiry. DePaul asserts that the ability to m...
| Основен автор: | DePaul, Michael R. 1954- |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Електронна книга |
| Език: | English |
| Публикувано: |
London ; New York :
Routledge,
1993.
|
| Предмети: | |
| Онлайн достъп: |
http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=178932 |
| Подобни документи: |
Print version::
Balance and refinement. |
Съдържание:
- Book Cover; Half-Title; Title; Copyright; Dedication; Contents; Preface; Introduction; Part I: Strategy; 1 The method of reflective equilibrium and the no contact with reality objection; 2 A strategy for defending a method of moral inequiry; Part II: Rationality; 3 The case for the rationality of radical reflective equilibrium ; 4 Naivete, corruption, and the method of balance and refinement; Part III: Warrant; 5 A perceptual model for the warrant of moral beliefs; Notes; Bibliography; Index.