Корично изображение Електронна книга

Assessing research-doctorate programs : a methodology study /

How should we assess and present information about the quality of research-doctorate programs? In recommending that the 1995 NRC rankings in Assessing the Quality of Research-Doctorate Programs: Continuity and Change be updated as soon as possible, this study presents an improved approach to doctora...

Пълно описание

Автор-организации: National Research Council (U.S.). Committee to Examine the Methodology for the Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs.
Други автори: Ostriker, J. P., Kuh, Charlotte V., Voytuk, James A.
Формат: Електронна книга
Език: English
Публикувано: Washington, D.C. : National Academies Press, ℗♭2003.
Предмети:
Research > United States > Evaluation.
Doctor of philosophy degree > United States > Evaluation.
Science > Study and teaching (Higher) > United States > Evaluation.
Engineering > Study and teaching (Higher) > United States > Evaluation.
Humanities > Study and teaching (Higher) > United States > Evaluation.
Education, Graduate.
Evaluation Studies.
Universities.
Biological Science Disciplines.
SCIENCE > Research & Methodology.
Doctor of philosophy degree > Evaluation.
Engineering > Study and teaching (Higher) > Evaluation.
Humanities > Study and teaching (Higher) > Evaluation.
Research > Evaluation.
Science > Study and teaching (Higher) > Evaluation.
Onderzoeksprojecten.
Beoordeling.
Recherche.
Evaluation.
Doctorat.
Sciences (Disciplines scientifiques)
Ingenierie.
Recherche universitaire.
United States.
United States > .
Etats-Unis.
Statistics.
Electronic books.
Онлайн достъп: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=104484
Подобни документи: Print version:: Assessing research-doctorate programs.
Съдържание:
  • ""FrontMatter""; ""Acknowledgments""; ""Contents""; ""List of Tables and Charts""; ""Executive Summary""; ""1 Introduction""; ""2 How the Study Was Conducted""; ""3 Taxonomy""; ""4 Quantitative Measures""; ""5 Student Education and Outcomes""; ""6 Reputation and Data Presentation""; ""7 General Conclusions and Recommendations""; ""References""; ""Appendixes""; ""Appendix A Committee and Panel Member Biographical Sketches""; ""Appendix B Program-Initiation Consultation with Organizations""; ""Appendix C Meetings and Participants""; ""Appendix D Sample Questionnaires""
  • ""Appendix E Taxonomy of Fields and Their Subfields""""Appendix F Fields for Ph. D.s Granted During 1996-2001""; ""Appendix G Technical and Statistical Techniques""; ""Alternate Ways to Present Rankings: Random Halves and Bootstrap Methods""; ""Correlates of Reputation Analysis""

Подобни библ. документи